Signal vs Telegram: Are your secrets at risk? Choices can be costly

    Data privacy and consumer protection are among the most important issues in modern media. Signal and Telegram are two of the most popular applications that offer different approaches to this problem. Although both companies claim to protect the personal data of their users, their methods differ significantly, which affects the way in which users are protected Latino companies adopt these platforms.

Signal: The complete privacy of personal life and the original philosophy

    Signal is an application maintained by the Signal Foundation, a non-profit organization originally designed to make possible the biggest inconvenience of personal life. The Signal website uses end-to-end (E2EE) encryption for all messages and calls. This means that only the sender and receiver can read or hear the transmitted data. Signal does not display any data at all, other than the minimum information necessary for the operation of the circuit, such as the date of creation The time and date of the last login.

 "Signal responds to the requests of law enforcement agencies, but provides data only on the date of creation of the account and the date of the last access to the network."

    This policy reflects Signal's commitment to data minimization, which means that they can only provide a minimum of information to organizations, without protection The presence of the communities.

     Not only does Signal guarantee privacy, but it also has a clear no-modification policy. All data will be copied to the user's website, the company does not have access to the content, which eliminates the possibility of tampering. This sends a good signal from the point of view of the airline, but also limits the possibility of dealing with illegal immigration.

Telegram: Balance between privacy and functionality

    Telegram offers a different approach to the environment. Because of Signal, it uses cloud-based encryption that allows users to sync chats between different devices. This feature requires the data to be shared, which theoretically gives Telegram the ability to access community content. However, Telegram's management claims that they provide data only in exceptional cases and when there are court decisions from several jurisdictions.

 "Telegram uses a distributed encryption key. The cloud chat data is spread across multiple data centers around the world, controlled by different entities located in multiple jurisdictions.”

    This material promises that Telegram uses distributed encryption for data encryption, which allows it to avoid the single-person control of a group diction. However, this also means that access to the data is possible under certain circumstances.

 "So far, we have not shared a single byte of customer data with third parties, including websites."

    Telegram confirms that they have not yet sent any customer data to third parties. However, it is important to note that the platform can technically do this if forced to do so.

    Telegram group chats and group chats are private to their members. We are not considering any actions related to her.

    This page states that Telegram ignores privacy requests for chats and groups, potentially preventing members of these groups from sharing information This content is without any protection. 

Modulation and binding instructions

    One of the most popular aspects of Telegram is its mod policy. Telegram states that they do not moderate the content of chats and groups, which makes the platform attractive to those who value freedom of speech. However, this policy has led to many criticisms and accusations that the platform is being used to promote illegal content, including violent content children, drug traffic and electronic propaganda.

"Telegram's terms of use state that illegal content is not allowed in public areas. Because of the restrictions on Telegram, only illegal activity, which includes tickers, channels and bots, takes place in these areas."

    This means that Telegram only modifies public channels, and private chats and groups are outside the scope of the account. This led to increased criticism of the platform, especially from human rights organizations and anti-government organizations.

    In the case of Signal, there is no such problem, as the platform does not have access to the presence of citizens' communities at all. However, this also means that Signal cannot help in the fight against illegal content. 

Conclusion

    The choice between Signal and Telegram depends mostly on the consumer's preferences. If complete privacy and data protection are most important to you, Signal will be the preferred choice for access to encryption and data minimization nnite. However, if the platform has more functionality, such as large groups and channels, Telegram can make you more attractive and connected to it icĸoves.

     It is important to note that Telegram is exposed to even greater pressure, which may lead to a change in my policies in the future. From the beginning, Signal continues to be a symbol of the non-stop innovation of personal life and the limitations of the functional one.

     Finally, consumers must assess both the environmental and functional needs, as well as the potential costs associated with the use of each platform. It is recommended that you first follow the changes to the policies of the two countries in order to make an informed decision about which one is the best for you and your days.

source:kaldata.com

Please rate my work and vote for my blog on: 

 
Follow ZigZag Library